Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: What does [WIP] really mean?


From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:52:08 -0400

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:
On 4/11/14 7:35 PM, mmann78 () netscape net wrote:
I've seen a handful of patches submitted to Gerrit with [WIP] in the
title.  Obviously this means "work in progress", but what does it mean
for reviewers of the patch?  Should reviews be held off until
more/better patches are submitted (with help accepted)?  Notification
that a feature is being worked on?  Please help me test this?

I've been using it for feature branches, to stage code that either has a
long development cycle or needs to be tested on different machines. My take:

- Reviews: If someone wants to review the code that's fine, but WIP
implies "moving target".

- Help: Always welcome, and the sort of thing that Gerrit is supposed to
facilitate.

- Notification: This is built-in as long as the commit title is
sufficiently descriptive.

- Testing: Always welcome.

The early feedback I Qt IO graph (change 435) helped to direct later
changes to the code.

If a reviewer thinks the current patch is "a good start" for a feature
(and worthy of current inclusion), is it okay to give the +2?

I don't see why not, but he or she should probably check with the
submitter first.

Since Gerrit doesn't seem to track multiple patches to a "feature" like
a Bugzilla ticket can, is the [WIP] trying to be "feature complete"
before submission?

It does as long as a single change ID maps to a "feature". I ended up
uploading 10 patch sets for the IO Graph.

You can also associate several changes by using the same topic name for each.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: