Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: What does [WIP] really mean?
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:52:08 -0400
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:
On 4/11/14 7:35 PM, mmann78 () netscape net wrote:I've seen a handful of patches submitted to Gerrit with [WIP] in the title. Obviously this means "work in progress", but what does it mean for reviewers of the patch? Should reviews be held off until more/better patches are submitted (with help accepted)? Notification that a feature is being worked on? Please help me test this?I've been using it for feature branches, to stage code that either has a long development cycle or needs to be tested on different machines. My take: - Reviews: If someone wants to review the code that's fine, but WIP implies "moving target". - Help: Always welcome, and the sort of thing that Gerrit is supposed to facilitate. - Notification: This is built-in as long as the commit title is sufficiently descriptive. - Testing: Always welcome. The early feedback I Qt IO graph (change 435) helped to direct later changes to the code.If a reviewer thinks the current patch is "a good start" for a feature (and worthy of current inclusion), is it okay to give the +2?I don't see why not, but he or she should probably check with the submitter first.Since Gerrit doesn't seem to track multiple patches to a "feature" like a Bugzilla ticket can, is the [WIP] trying to be "feature complete" before submission?It does as long as a single change ID maps to a "feature". I ended up uploading 10 patch sets for the IO Graph.
You can also associate several changes by using the same topic name for each. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- What does [WIP] really mean? mmann78 (Apr 11)
- Re: What does [WIP] really mean? Gerald Combs (Apr 14)
- Re: What does [WIP] really mean? Evan Huus (Apr 14)
- Re: What does [WIP] really mean? Guy Harris (Apr 14)
- Re: What does [WIP] really mean? Bálint Réczey (Apr 15)
- Re: What does [WIP] really mean? Gerald Combs (Apr 14)