Re: Idea for process image dissection

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Oct 15, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com> wrote:

> Ok. But then the question comes up, if a UI interface should be part
> of Wireshark or part of wsgd. As a last resort wsgd could be ported to
> wireshark, but this is a shoe I would only put on me as a last step.

wsgd is currently a plugin dissector for Wireshark, so I'm not sure what "ported to Wireshark" would mean.

I think it should, in some form, be incorporated into Wireshark, so as to, at minimum, allow people to add support for 
new protocols to Wireshark without having to write C or C++ code and run a compiler to build a plugin or a new version 
of Wireshark with a new builtin dissector.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe