Re: Idea for process image dissection

[Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>]

Ok. But then the question comes up, if a UI interface should be part
of Wireshark or part of wsgd. As a last resort wsgd could be ported to
wireshark, but this is a shoe I would only put on me as a last step.

Also, should I implement the new UI only for the new (Qt) interface,
or for the GTK interface as well? I would prefer the first step, as I
do have good knowledge of the framework, but very little about GTK.

kind regards,
Roland

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Graham Bloice
<graham.bloice () trihedral com> wrote:
> On 15 October 2013 17:25, Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > I actually did not know about wsgd.free.fr. For what I want to
> > achieve, this would be completely sufficient. But It would need a UI,
> > because the definition of the wsgd and fdesc files would be too much
> > for the nomal user.
> >
> > I will work on that instead, and see where I can go from there.
> >
> > Just one question though, why is this plugin not part of wireshark?
>
> I think the main reason is that it's C++.
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe