Re: 1.11.0 release

[Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>]

On 10/10/2013 10:56 AM, mmann78 () netscape net wrote:
> My vote would be to install in a central location and make it just
> another step in

+1


> http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChSetupWin32.html, just
> like installing Visual Studio.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Sent: Wed, Oct 9, 2013 8:36 pm
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] 1.11.0 release
>
>
> For people doing development on Windows, would you rather have the Qt
> SDK in a central location on yoursystem  (I've been using c:\Qt) or in
> WIRESHARK_LIB_DIR with everything else (which means taking up a lot of
> space if you have multiple WIRESHARK_LIB_DIRs)?
>
> Also, should we dump the Qt ZIP archives into SVN or distribute them
> separately? Or tell people to download the official version from
> qt-project.org? I've signed the DLLs and executables in the archives
> above with the Wireshark Foundation key. I'm not sure if Digia does the
> same for the official distribution.
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>               mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe