Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: compile test of checkins mandatory ?
From: Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:18:50 +0000
On 8 November 2013 15:09, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster () gmx de> wrote:
In the past few weeks I run more often than expected after a "svn update" into an build error, mostly obvious coding style issues / typos / "treat warning as errors" were the culprit. This let me wondering, if there isn't a hook in the central svn server to reject such check-in attempts ?
How would the hook determine that the committer had compiled the code without errors on all platforms? This is one of the advantages of the proposed gerrit workflow that would move all changes into branches and test compile them on buildbots before merging to trunk. A similar thing could be done with svn but I don't know of any (free) tooling that does that. We have a custom semi-automatic version using svn in my day job. Graham
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- compile test of checkins mandatory ? Toralf Förster (Nov 08)
- Re: compile test of checkins mandatory ? Anders Broman (Nov 08)
- Re: compile test of checkins mandatory ? Gilbert Ramirez (Nov 08)
- Re: compile test of checkins mandatory ? Graham Bloice (Nov 08)
- Re: compile test of checkins mandatory ? Jeff Morriss (Nov 11)
- Re: compile test of checkins mandatory ? Toralf Förster (Nov 11)