Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: compile test of checkins mandatory ?


From: Gilbert Ramirez <gram () alumni rice edu>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 07:18:29 -0800

I'd prefer to let the buildbots take care of it after the commits, because
of the different OSes (and different compilers) that have to be built for
full verification.  I'm wary of too much pre-commit process.

Perhaps the future Gerrit infrastructure can make this part of the
workflow, after code-review, but before final merge?

Gilbert


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster () gmx de>wrote:

In the past few weeks I run more often than expected after a "svn
update" into an build error, mostly obvious coding style issues / typos
/ "treat warning as errors" were the culprit.

This let me wondering, if there isn't a hook in the central svn server
to reject such check-in attempts ?


--
MfG/Sincerely
Toralf Förster
pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: