Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers

[Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>]

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:12:10AM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com> wrote:
> > For the record we last discussed this a little over a year ago:
> >
> > http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201105/msg00202.html
> >
> > As for adding something to the doc: sure but I doubt it'll help much.
>
> I'm a fan of a macro like Jakub mentioned as part of the old conversation:
>
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201105/msg00205.html

Myself I'm still fan of forking gnulib snprintf() and naming it ws_snprintf() ;)

Later we could add new conversion specifier for addresses (IPv4, IPv6, ...), 
thousands grouping, or other ideas from: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201206/msg00176.html
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe