Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: L2CP and Slow Network


From: Josue Del Valle <jodelvalle () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:51:37 -0400

I am really sorry.  It was not my intenssion to cause any troubles.  I am new using the list.  Should I resend it with 
a smaller attachment or no attachment? 

Again, I apologize for any inconvenience caused.

JD

Sent from my iPhone
----------------------------------
Please excuse brevity and spelling.

On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:33 AM, Giles Coochey <giles () coochey net> wrote:

On 04/10/2011 02:32, Josue Del Valle wrote:

Hi,

We recently received a call from Brighthouse letting us know that we were sending to much L2CP traffic to them and 
they asked us if we could stop it because it could cause performance issues.

You nearly got a call from me about sending too much large attachments to discussion mailing lists... did you really 
need to post a 13.8Mb text packet capture to the list, and do you really think that anybody is going to trawl through 
it or be vaguely interested in any way other than hitting the delete button??

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: