Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: L2CP and Slow Network
From: Giles Coochey <giles () coochey net>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:33:06 +0100
On 04/10/2011 02:32, Josue Del Valle wrote:
Hi,We recently received a call from Brighthouse letting us know that we were sending to much L2CP traffic to them and they asked us if we could stop it because it could cause performance issues.
You nearly got a call from me about sending too much large attachments to discussion mailing lists... did you really need to post a 13.8Mb text packet capture to the list, and do you really think that anybody is going to trawl through it or be vaguely interested in any way other than hitting the delete button??
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- L2CP and Slow Network Josue Del Valle (Oct 04)
- L2CP and Slow Network Josue Del Valle (Oct 04)
- Re: L2CP and Slow Network Giles Coochey (Oct 04)
- Re: L2CP and Slow Network Josue Del Valle (Oct 04)
- Re: L2CP and Slow Network Giles Coochey (Oct 05)
- Re: L2CP and Slow Network Stephen Fisher (Oct 05)
- Re: L2CP and Slow Network Giles Coochey (Oct 04)
- L2CP and Slow Network Josue Del Valle (Oct 04)