Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: New GCC, new option required?
From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:09:54 -0600
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:40:09PM +0300, Kaul wrote:
- CLANG static analyzer was also quite helpful in finding issues. It just takes hours to compile wireshark with it.
Did you see that Gerald has an automated build that dumps clang output here: http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/analysis/ ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- New GCC, new option required? Jaap Keuter (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Jaap Keuter (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Guy Harris (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Kaul (Jul 14)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Stephen Fisher (Jul 14)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)