Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: New GCC, new option required?
From: Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:47:30 -0400
Re: > AC_WIRESHARK_GCC_CFLAGS_CHECK(-Wno-unused-but-set-variable) Is there a (reasionably easy) way to use this option only when compiling in the .../dissectors directory ? (I think that I've previously addressed the "unused_but_set" warnings for many (all ?) of the other directories). (SVN 37600 & following...)
PS: I've been using AC_WIRESHARK_GCC_CFLAGS_CHECK(-Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable) so that "unused-but-set-variable" is reported but treated as a warning instead of an error. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- New GCC, new option required? Jaap Keuter (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Jaap Keuter (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Guy Harris (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Kaul (Jul 14)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Stephen Fisher (Jul 14)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)