Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Compiling Wireshark for Win32


From: "news.gmane.com" <AndreasSander1 () gmx net>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:28:59 +0200


"Stig Bjørlykke" <stig () bjorlykke org> wrote in
message
news:CANoXo1QNRsjQq39xqEYW+W3vNib0OxV5bJCbZ0H15CJKuBnGZw () mail gmail com...
I am a bit surprised about a problem with compiling Wireshark 1.6.0 with
Visual Studio 2005 for Win32.

Why do you build 1.6.0 when we have released 1.6.1?
The issues you have are fixed in 1.6.1.

I don't want to build 1.6.x at all. I want to upgrade all my dissectors for
propriary protocols to Wireshark 1.6. Since there are no PDB files for 1.6.0
(found only for 1.7 at http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/win32/)
and no import library files I need compile Wireshark with all that CygWin,
Python, ... installation.

Since the ABI should not change in the "stable branch" I should be able to
compile to any version as long as I only need a set of files to build a
dissector DLL and to debug the DLL in Wireshark.

*All I need is:*
- libwireshark.lib
- all PDB files
- all header files (these can be retrieved using SVN)

Should I expect that Wireshark source doesn't get through the supported
compiler? I know that there are bugs in any software, but usually a change
in the last part of the version number indicates a bugfix in the
implementation.

Okay, I follow your suggestiong, compiling 1.6.1....


Linking libwireshark.dll
 link /INCREMENTAL:NO /NOLOGO .........
 Creating library libwireshark.lib and object libwireshark.exp
GeoIP.lib(GeoIP.obj) : fatal error LNK1103: debugging information corrupt; 
recompile module

BTW: The GeoIP-1.4.6-win32ws.zip has been downloaded during this try of 
build.

--
Andy




___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: