Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: One NIC on public side


From: "Terry Martin" <tmartin () timedatacorp com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 23:37:05 -0500

Depending on the OS. You may need to aet the port you are monitoring  
into permiscuous mode. Some do not auto configure

I am not sure how secure it will be,  it depends on the firewall. You  
still have a Mac address that can be attack

I am also causious

Sent from my iPhone

On May 12, 2010, at 11:20 PM, "mike () grounded net" <mike () grounded net>  
wrote:

The server I'm using wireshark on has two NICs.
I put NIC0 on the LAN side which is how I remotely manage the server.
I put NIC1 on a hub just before the firewall so that I can see all  
public traffic before it hits the firewall.

On NIC1, I do not have any IP assigned which is on my lan but have  
169.254.1.2 on it.
From what I understand, the NIC goes into promiscuous mode when  
wireshark and other network monitoring software fires up to use that  
NIC.

What I wondered about was, just now safe is it to have that NIC on  
the public side?

Thanks.

___________________________________________________________________________
 

Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org 

Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org? 
subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: