Wireshark mailing list archives

Routines for registering dissectors with a "port number", and looking up dissectors by "port number", renamed


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:02:16 -0800

I've checked into the trunk a change to rename:

        dissector_add() -> dissector_add_uint()

        dissector_change() -> dissector_change_uint()

        dissector_delete() -> dissector_delete_uint()

        dissector_get_port_handle() -> dissector_get_uint_handle()

        dissector_reset() -> dissector_reset_uint()

        dissector_try_port() -> dissector_try_uint()

        dissector_try_port_new() -> dissector_try_uint_new()

        next_tvb_add_port() -> next_tvb_add_uint() (and a matching change of NTVB_PORT -> NTVB_UINT)

with #defines left behind so old code continues to build and work.  The intent is to make it a little more obvious that 
this is for arbitrary unsigned-integer selectors, not just TCP/UDP/etc. ports (selecting on, for example, an Ethernet 
type actually works better than selecting on a port number...), and to make the names match what's used for 
string-based dissector tables.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: