Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: wireshark capture shows packets not chronologically captured
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:10:54 -0800
On Dec 19, 2010, at 7:06 AM, Romel Khan wrote:
$ uname -a Linux ... SMP ...
Wow, what a surprise: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.3/0119.html Is there no way to tell Linux to arrange that packets be delivered to a PF_PACKET socket in time stamp order? If not, is there any way to, at least, provide some mechanism to allow libpcap to sort the packets in time stamp order before it delivers them? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- wireshark capture shows packets not chronologically captured Romel Khan (Dec 17)
- Re: wireshark capture shows packets not chronologically captured Guy Harris (Dec 17)
- Re: wireshark capture shows packets not chronologically captured Romel Khan (Dec 19)
- Re: wireshark capture shows packets not chronologically captured Guy Harris (Dec 19)
- Re: wireshark capture shows packets not chronologically captured Stephen Fisher (Dec 20)
- Re: wireshark capture shows packets not chronologically captured Guy Harris (Dec 20)
- Re: wireshark capture shows packets not chronologically captured Romel Khan (Dec 19)
- Re: wireshark capture shows packets not chronologically captured Guy Harris (Dec 17)