Re: RFC: sorted value_string + bsearch

[Anders Broman <a.broman () telia com>]

Hi,
I like it!
Can you provide an example use of the new value_string_ext as well?
Regards
Anders

Jakub Zawadzki skrev 2010-04-26 21:13:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:32:16PM +0200, Anders Broman wrote:
>    
> > like a full table starting at a number ( like 500 - 1000 ->value  match index minus
> > offset).
> >      
> Uhm, sounds complicated :)
>
> Maybe we can initialize match_type in proto_register_field_init()
> so developer don't need to care if it's sorted or no...
>
> We can do it also during first use of match_strval_fast() (which might be
> better option)
>
> Attaching patch, btw. I changed _fast to _ext.
>    
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list<wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>               mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe