Re: RFC: sorted value_string + bsearch

[Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames () darkjames ath cx>]

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 01:20:46PM +0300, Kaul wrote:
> In some cases, wouldn't it make more sense to put the more
> commonly used string near the top and perform a normal search?

Maybe (wireshark is used in so many different environments and smth which is common in network A, might not be in 
network B)
I think also it makes small sense to use value_string_fast with less than 16 or 32 (or even 64) entries.

Anyway I would keep linear search API and make dissector developer decide.

I thought about binary search when I tried to fix bug #594 [1]
with value_string array [2]. There're about 5k entries for tcp services.

[1] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=594
[2] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4324
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe