Re: Should login pages be protected by SSL?

[Andrew van der Stock <vanderaj () greebo net>]

Depends on the value of the system in use.

I help develop forum software, and millions of people use forum  
software without SSL every day. In fact, most forum software have a  
password equivalent cookie which can lead to complete compromise from  
cookie stealing, and yet most users will not give up the convenience  
of auto login.

OTOH, where the login leads to private data, such as your name and  
address, I feel that corporations have a duty of care to protect your  
data under the various privacy acts around the world. The cost of a  
certificate is much less than potential litigation, or more to the  
point, reputation loss if someone discovers a way around it.

However, if it's a shopping cart type of thing, like Amazon, the  
thing that should be SSL is not the browsing of goods, but the  
transactions, particularly the credit card and address details. The  
Visa/MC PCI guidelines are quite stringent on applying reasonable  
controls to this data. In the case of Amazon 1-click, then  
effectively the 1-click is the thing requiring protection, so some  
form of control around that is also required. So if you're allowed to  
browse and add items without SSL (ie you're using some form of  
password analog in the cookie), then as soon as you're about to see  
some private data, my view is that re-authentication and completing  
the transaction over SSL should be required. Going SSL may not  
necessarily help with CSRF attacks.

If the corp has COBIT requirements (ie they're using COBIT to do  
SOX), then you might have better luck; grab COBIT and see what  
controls should have been applied. That usually focuses their  
attention, particularly if the application forms part of their  
financial systems.

Lastly, if SSL is not used the entire time, then the "Secure" option  
of the cookie cannot be used. This is a weakening of an already weak  
control, but people shouldn't throw it away to just to save a few  
bucks on a certificate.

Andrew

On 21/06/2005, at 2:20 AM, Amir Herzberg wrote:

> Here is a simple question: should web login forms be always  
> protected by SSL?