Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
RE: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin
From: Richard Rager <kb8rln () PENGUINMASTER COM>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:51:31 -0700 (MST)
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
In my opinion, Radar Detector devices have no legitimate usage;
therefore,
they can be confiscated on sight. On the other hand, a tool such as Kismet or Netstumbler can be used by a qualified security analyst to perform risk testing on a wireless network. But since I am not a lawyer, either, I may be full of crap. -Jason
I am not a lawyer either but I have my Extra Class Amateur Radio Licence. I have used a radar detector and a break checker (10 Ghz cw transmitter) for at 10 Ghz QSO (talk to some on on the air). If you have a radio detector with a signal strength meter you can have a AM 10 Ghz receiver. I bought all this for less then 50 dollar not bad. If you would like more information look at http://www.arrl.com. By the way if some one has their a FCC Amateur licence it my be hard to remove there radio transmitter/receiver for 10 Ghz. Fed law normal over rule state law. Just wanted to point out that a radar detector can be used for good uses. By the way here are the some of the frequencies that can be used for Amateur Radio. 2300-2310 MHz 2390-2450 MHz - WAP11 band 2400Mhz - 2483.5Mhz is the North America, Europe, Korea and Extended Japan Band 3300-3500 MHz 5650-5925 MHz 10.0-10.5 GHz - Radio Detector 24.0-24.25 GHz 47.0-47.2 GHz 75.5-81.0 GHz 119.98-120.02 GHz 142-149 GHz 241-250 GHz All above 300 GHz Note: Highest know QSO is at 1200 Ghz. That I know of.
-----Original Message----- From: Ralf Dreibrodt [mailto:ralf () dreibrodt de] Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 01:23 PM To: ZeroBreak Cc: Security Focus - Vulnerability Development Subject: Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Hi, one example: ZeroBreak wrote:The frequencies used are all open to the public.AFAIK the frequencies of a radar trap are open to the public. > It does not send out anyprobes, it sits in promiscuous mode and pulls in packets and gives an output like netstumbler. That goes a step further than netstumbler. Your card isn't sending anything at all it's just listening.a radar warning system is only listenig to the "pakets" and gives an alarm. in the meanwhile in germany every policemen is allowed to seize a radar warning system, if he sees one. it even doesn't have to be switched on. perhaps there is any lawyer on the list?!? i will see one in about one month, perhaps i can ask for his opinion about sniffing in an unprotected wireless lan, but i think at least in germany it is not allowed. bye Ralf
--
Current thread:
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin, (continued)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Tim Landscheidt (Mar 17)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Eduardo Cruz (Mar 17)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Joe Stanievich (Mar 17)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin batz (Mar 19)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Bill Pennington (Mar 25)
- RE: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Erik Hjelmstad (Mar 25)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin shawn merdinger (Mar 25)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Richard Masoner (Mar 15)
- RE: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Everhart, Glenn (FUSA) (Mar 15)
- RE: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin DePriest, Jason R. (Mar 18)
- RE: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Richard Rager (Mar 19)
- RE: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin neitherj (Mar 26)
- RE: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin sfijn (Mar 26)
- RE: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Lincoln Yeoh (Mar 26)
- RE: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin sfijn (Mar 26)