Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
RE: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin
From: "ZeroBreak" <ZeroBreak () softhome net>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 23:57:04 -0500
The frequencies used are all open to the public. This is not to say that if your computer gets in range and you grab an ip address from their dhcp server just cause your computer is running, that some lawyer can't find a way to get you. While netstumbler sends out probes, you could also use kismet, which is completely passive. It does not send out any probes, it sits in promiscuous mode and pulls in packets and gives an output like netstumbler. That goes a step further than netstumbler. Your card isn't sending anything at all it's just listening. -----Original Message----- From: Russell Handorf [mailto:rhandorf () mail russells-world com] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 4:05 PM To: Bill Pennington; vuln-dev () securityfocus com Subject: Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Would anyone who is a lawyer be willing to comment? :P At 11:00 AM 3/15/2002 -0800, you wrote:
First off I am not a lawyer :-)
<snip> russ ================================== Russell Handorf oooo, shiney ::Wanders after it:: www.russells-world.com www.philly2600.net "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." Kristian Wilson Nintendo Inc. 1989 ==================================
Current thread:
- Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Russell Handorf (Mar 15)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Bill Pennington (Mar 15)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Russell Handorf (Mar 15)
- RE: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin ZeroBreak (Mar 16)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Ralf Dreibrodt (Mar 16)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Tim Landscheidt (Mar 17)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Eduardo Cruz (Mar 17)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Joe Stanievich (Mar 17)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Russell Handorf (Mar 15)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Bill Pennington (Mar 15)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin batz (Mar 19)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Bill Pennington (Mar 25)
- RE: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Erik Hjelmstad (Mar 25)
- Re: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin shawn merdinger (Mar 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Wireless Legality- Netstumbler and kin Everhart, Glenn (FUSA) (Mar 15)