Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: DoS against DHCP
From: Russell Handorf <rhandorf () mail russells-world com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:34:35 -0500
#!/bin/sh counter=0 if [ $# -eq 0 ] thenecho "You're missing the arguement of how many times for me to repeat."
exit 1 fi while [ $counter -le $1 ] do ifconfig eth0 down ./changemac -r pump ifconfig eth0 coutner=`expr $counter + 1` done echo "done"Contingent on you having changemac or some other way to randomize a new mac addy.
russ At 02:20 PM 1/30/2002 -0800, you wrote:
I came up with this about a year back at DefCon, and told some friendsin hopes that either they or I would do something with it, but none of us had time so here goes, and please feel free to write this yourself. DoS against DHCP: A DHCP server has only a certain amount of addresses availible. If you (a single malicious machine connected to the network) actively take up all availible IP address, and compete against the machines that are currently connected you should be able to completely take all availible IP addresses and block access to the DHCP server. You could do this by opening many interfaces on a linux box and asking for many DHCP addresses and lying that you connected before any competing machines (or DoS the competing machine directly until the DHCP server releases the IP address to you). This combined with war-driving could take down any DHCP IP address block within wireless range. Kinda nasty, but only effective as long as youstay connected to the network, so a compromised machine on the network might be necessary for extended DoS. Probably the way around this would be a) some sort of authentication to log into the DHCP server and or b) using leap or somethingsimilar. MAC addresses are spoofable, so it probably wouldn't be a good idea to limit the number of times a particular MAC address connects to the network, as that would just be a sloppy obfuscation. DHCP has always seemed like a bad idea to me. Sorry if this seems obvious.
================================== Russell Handorf oooo, shiney ::Wanders after it:: www.russells-world.com www.philly2600.net"Computer games don't affect kids, I mean if Pacman affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching pills and listening to repetitive music." ~unknown
==================================
Current thread:
- switch jamming Jan (Jan 30)
- Re: switch jamming Securism (Jan 30)
- Re: switch jamming Sebastian Jaenicke (Jan 30)
- Re: switch jamming Todd Suiter (Jan 30)
- DoS against DHCP RSnake (Jan 30)
- RE: DoS against DHCP John Stauffacher (Jan 30)
- Re: DoS against DHCP Russell Handorf (Jan 30)
- Re: DoS against DHCP Craig Van Tassle (Jan 30)
- Re: DoS against DHCP Felix Lindner (Jan 31)
- Re: switch jamming Blue Boar (Jan 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: switch jamming Ed Moyle (Jan 30)
- Re: switch jamming sean whalen (Jan 30)
- RE: switch jamming Henniges, Matthew (ISS) (Jan 30)
- RE: switch jamming Anthony Gruppuso (Jan 31)
- Re: switch jamming Blue Boar (Jan 31)
- Re: switch jamming ALoR (Jan 31)
- RE: switch jamming Alexander (Jan 31)
- Re: switch jamming Blue Boar (Jan 31)
(Thread continues...)