Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Another new worm???
From: BlueBoar () THIEVCO COM (Blue Boar)
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:16:47 -0700
And that's enough said on that topic from both sides. I will drop with prejudice anymore posts on whether obtaining virus updates after you've expired is morally/legally right. BB Dan Schrader wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Crispin Cowan [mailto:crispin () WIREX COM] So they may be *intending* to charge me for the service, but they're not achieving that :-) CrispinLack of authentication is not a justification for stealing. If your contract with Symantec says that you need to pay for the updates and you are not, you are stealing. Just because the newstand across the street doesn't have a security guard it doesn't follow that the newspapers are free. Dan Schrader Trend Micro
Current thread:
- Re: Another new worm???, (continued)
- Re: Another new worm??? Blue Boar (Jun 26)
- Webramp 310e Call Back Tom Sutherland (Jun 27)
- Re: Another new worm??? Erik Debill (Jun 27)
- HP's OpenMail 6.0 for linux. Larry Cashdollar (Jun 27)
- Re: Another new worm??? Dimitry Andric (Jun 27)
- linux-ftpd 0.16 is also vulnerable Paulo Ribeiro (Jun 27)
- Re: linux-ftpd 0.16 is also vulnerable Daniel Jacobowitz (Jun 28)
- Re: Another new worm??? Blue Boar (Jun 26)
- Re: Another new worm??? Dan Schrader (Jun 26)
- Re: Another new worm??? edurflinger () CORNINGDATA COM (Jun 28)
- Re: Another new worm??? Dan Schrader (Jun 28)
- Re: Another new worm??? Blue Boar (Jun 28)
- Re: Another new worm??? tschweikle () FIDUCIA DE (Jun 28)