Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Another new worm???
From: dagon () DAGON NET (Mark Rafn)
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:46:31 -0700
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 sigipp () WELLA COM BR wrote:
One more thing: For me it is simply impossible to "delete an offending e-mail with telnet".
...
I get my mail with Lotus Notes, and i donĀ“t have any information about the underlying protocol
This is your choice, and for a list like this one, it's probably a bad choice. I'd strongly recommend you get a mailer you can trust or throwaway (isp with qmail or sendmail, letting you use POP or IMAP to retrieve, or hotmail-like throwaway). E-mail safety is your responsibility on all lists. But ESPECIALLY on this list. If you can't trust your mailer, get another for this list at least. -- Mark Rafn dagon () dagon net <http://www.dagon.net/>
Current thread:
- Re: Another new worm???, (continued)
- Re: Another new worm??? Michael W. Shaffer (Jun 23)
- Re: Another new worm??? Bennett Todd (Jun 24)
- Re: Another new worm??? Crispin Cowan (Jun 25)
- Re: Another new worm??? Elias Levy (Jun 26)
- Re: Another new worm??? Crispin Cowan (Jun 27)
- Re: Another new worm??? Dino Amato (Jun 28)
- dalnet 4.6.5 remote vulnerability Matt Conover (Jun 28)
- *snprinf vs strncpy (misconception) Matt Conover (Jun 28)
- Re: Another new worm??? Michael W. Shaffer (Jun 23)
- Re: Another new worm??? Mark Rafn (Jun 26)
- Re: Another new worm??? Blue Boar (Jun 26)
- Webramp 310e Call Back Tom Sutherland (Jun 27)
- Re: Another new worm??? Erik Debill (Jun 27)
- HP's OpenMail 6.0 for linux. Larry Cashdollar (Jun 27)
- Re: Another new worm??? Dimitry Andric (Jun 27)
- linux-ftpd 0.16 is also vulnerable Paulo Ribeiro (Jun 27)
- Re: linux-ftpd 0.16 is also vulnerable Daniel Jacobowitz (Jun 28)