Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux
From: "Timothy J. Miller" <cerebus () SACKHEADS ORG>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 09:21:50 -0600
Neal Dias <NDias () SUNGLASSHUT COM> writes:
As M. Shubert pointed out, let's remember that the NSA was not touting SeLinux as a "trusted" solution, but a "security enhanced" linux.
Even beyond auditing requirements pointed out elsewhere, someone needs to do the covert channel analysis (a notoriously hard problem) before it could *really* be called "trusted." -- Cerebus
Current thread:
- The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Ralf-Philipp Weinmann (Dec 21)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Scott D. Yelich (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Michael H. Warfield (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Scott D. Yelich (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Michael H. Warfield (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Michael H. Warfield (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux M Schubert (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Scott D. Yelich (Dec 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Neal Dias (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Neal Dias (Dec 25)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Dom De Vitto (Dec 26)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Neal Dias (Dec 27)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Timothy J. Miller (Dec 28)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Scott D. Yelich (Dec 29)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux M.Schubert (Dec 29)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Neal Dias (Dec 29)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux geoffrey (Dec 29)