Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux
From: Neal Dias <NDias () SUNGLASSHUT COM>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 11:51:19 -0500
It frightens me that anyone would trust ANY operating system that hasn't been properly configured and locked down, and that would go for Solaris or any other OS I can think of ATM. It doesn't need sugar on top, just some of the filling removed, as with any other OS. Neal Dias UNIX Systems Administrator Sunglass Hut International, MIS Dept. office: (305) 648-6479 mobile: (786) 368-5742 wk. email: NDias () sunglasshut com pvt. email: emperor.1 () netzero net ******************************************************************************* Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you. -Nietzsche Any opinions expressed above or below are entirely my own and may not reflect those of my employers. The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the receipt and use of the individual(s) or entity(s) named above. If the reader of this email message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for its delivery to the intended and or addressed recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited except at the express consent of its author. "Scott D. Yelich" <scott@SCOTTYELICH To: VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM .COM> cc: Sent by: VULN-DEV Subject: Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux List <VULN-DEV@SECURITY FOCUS.COM> 12/22/00 07:18 AM Please respond to "Scott D. Yelich" On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann wrote:
citing http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/background.html: [...] The result is available for download at the above URL as well. Has anyone here toyed with it already ? Cheers, -Ralf
Seems like this is a "demo" ... would anyone be able to compare this system to a system that is not attempting to be a demo -- such as Pitbull (solaris?)? It frightens me to think that anyone would trust linux :-> but, alas, who knows. Maybe is enough sugar is poured on top, it just won't continue to smell so bad. Scott
Current thread:
- The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Ralf-Philipp Weinmann (Dec 21)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Scott D. Yelich (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Michael H. Warfield (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Scott D. Yelich (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Michael H. Warfield (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Michael H. Warfield (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux M Schubert (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Scott D. Yelich (Dec 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Neal Dias (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Neal Dias (Dec 25)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Dom De Vitto (Dec 26)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Neal Dias (Dec 27)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Timothy J. Miller (Dec 28)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Scott D. Yelich (Dec 29)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux M.Schubert (Dec 29)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Neal Dias (Dec 29)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux geoffrey (Dec 29)