Re: A puzzled maintainer with questions regarding

["M.Baris Demiray" <barisdemiray () gmail com>]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2011, at 5:14 AM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
>
> > Indeed, may be you could also add (along with the link to the old
> > unclassified version) that new versions of STANAG 5066 haven't
> > introduced any alterations to D_PDU headers and the last edition,
> > Edition 3, is totally backward compatible with this old 1.0.2 version;
> > since this would help to encourage those who want to contribute and/or
> > debug without a STANAG 5066 specification at hand. But, with or
> > without this notification, I agree on the definition you wrote.
>
> OK, I've assigned 237 for LINKTYPE_STANAG_5066_D_PDU/DLT_STANAG_5066_D_PDU.  The description that should show up, 
> within 24 hours or so, on
>
>        http://www.tcpdump.org/linktypes.html
>
> will be
>
>        D_PDUs as described by NATO standard STANAG 5066, starting with the synchronization sequence, and including 
> both header and data CRCs. The current version of STANAG 5066 is backwards-compatible with the 1.0.2 version, 
> although newer versions are classified.
>
> with "the 1.0.2 version" linking to
>
>        http://www.armymars.net/ArmyMARS/HF-Email/resources/stanag5066.pdf-

Great, thanks!

> This is the tcpdump-workers list.
> Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.

-- 
M. Baris Demiray
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.