Re: A puzzled maintainer with questions regarding

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Mar 14, 2011, at 5:14 AM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:

> Indeed, may be you could also add (along with the link to the old
> unclassified version) that new versions of STANAG 5066 haven't
> introduced any alterations to D_PDU headers and the last edition,
> Edition 3, is totally backward compatible with this old 1.0.2 version;
> since this would help to encourage those who want to contribute and/or
> debug without a STANAG 5066 specification at hand. But, with or
> without this notification, I agree on the definition you wrote.

OK, I've assigned 237 for LINKTYPE_STANAG_5066_D_PDU/DLT_STANAG_5066_D_PDU.  The description that should show up, 
within 24 hours or so, on

        http://www.tcpdump.org/linktypes.html

will be

        D_PDUs as described by NATO standard STANAG 5066, starting with the synchronization sequence, and including 
both header and data CRCs. The current version of STANAG 5066 is backwards-compatible with the 1.0.2 version, although 
newer versions are classified.

with "the 1.0.2 version" linking to

        http://www.armymars.net/ArmyMARS/HF-Email/resources/stanag5066.pdf-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.