Re: flowbits: netsenum

[waldo kitty <wkitty42 () windstream net>]

On 5/30/2013 07:01, Joel Esler wrote:
> On May 29, 2013, at 7:53 PM, waldo kitty<wkitty42 () windstream net>  wrote:
>
> > > > additionally, both existing rules' MSG are identical... one should
> > > > speak of "to client" and the other "to server" in the MSG for
> > > > clarity??
> > >
> > > The "set" rule is noalert. You'll never see it alert.
> >
> > true but perhaps someone sets them to show an alert? ;)
>
> Is that something you do?  I'm not asking that to be a smartass, I'm asking
> if that's actually a use case that I haven't studied.

we have had some folks do that so they could follow thru with the processing 
flow and the rules that are seen... it was a mess that some of them regretted 
having done and a revert of the updater's conf along with a new rules pack 
download sussed that...

at least they were smart enough to also adjust the priority to 5 or higher so 
the reactive alert blocking mechanism didn't go blocking the entire internet 
based on them ;)

-- 
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
       Please keep mailing list traffic on the list unless
       private contact is specifically requested and granted.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
http://www.snort.org


Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!