Re: flowbits: netsenum

[Joel Esler <jesler () sourcefire com>]

On May 29, 2013, at 10:57 AM, waldo kitty <wkitty42 () windstream net> wrote:

> there is no check rule in the *.rules files for flowbits: netsenum…
It's checked in 24007.


> additionally, both existing rules' MSG are identical... one should speak of "to 
> client" and the other "to server" in the MSG for clarity??

The "set" rule is noalert.  You'll never see it alert.

--
Joel Esler
Senior Research Engineer, VRT
OpenSource Community Manager
Sourcefire

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1

_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
http://www.snort.org


Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!