Snort mailing list archives
Re: Reconstruction of TCP packets
From: Dirk Geschke <Dirk_Geschke () genua de>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:03:12 +0200
Hi Rajesh,
I gave the following options in the snort.conf (Snort-2.1.0) preprocessor stream4_reassemble: both, ports 25 3131 I am using the port 3131 for test purpose.... I made a client server program which will send packets to port 3131. I am sending big packets to check the packet reassembling.
I am not quite sure but I think the "established" keyword should be present in the matching rule. Is this the case? Regards Dirk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Reconstruction of TCP packets Rajesh Joseph (Mar 29)
- Re: Reconstruction of TCP packets Dirk Geschke (Mar 29)
- Re: Reconstruction of TCP packets Rajesh Joseph (Mar 29)
- Re: Reconstruction of TCP packets Jason Haar (Mar 29)
- Re: Reconstruction of TCP packets Rajesh Joseph (Mar 30)
- Re: Reconstruction of TCP packets Dirk Geschke (Mar 30)
- Re: Reconstruction of TCP packets Rajesh Joseph (Mar 31)
- Re: Reconstruction of TCP packets Dirk Geschke (Mar 31)
- Re: Reconstruction of TCP packets Rajesh Joseph (Mar 29)
- Re: Reconstruction of TCP packets Dirk Geschke (Mar 29)