Snort mailing list archives
Re: Design questions...
From: "Jarret Gibson" <jarret () osa comax com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:41:56 -0500
Design questions...Right now, I am having a single Win 2k server which I do web development from (P3 400, 128 RAM) which is also running snort to monitor two T-1 lines and a 10 mbps network of about 25 systems. It is logging to its MSSQL installation. Believe it or not, it's actually handling all the traffic pretty flawlessly. I do have to reboot it every few days as Snort and MSSQL slowly but surely seem to consume my page file (memory leak? not sure). IMO, I'd give it a shot. The two T-1 lines would be no problem for a modern dedicated machine to keep up with. The 100 mbps networks, I honestly don't know. If it's doing nothing but running snort, I'm betting it would handle it. Take what ya can get and give it a try :D Jarret Gibson ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeremy Finke To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:45 AM Subject: [Snort-users] Design questions... Hi, hopefully, my email is sorted out now and this will get through... I have some performance questions that I hope that someone would be able to help me out with. I am trying to convince my boss to start implementing snort at a serious level. Problem is, he is a windows/closed source type of guy and I am a unix/open source type of guy. I am trying to convince him to buy seperate boxes for each of the sensors and then a logging box that has its own private network to send data across. Ideally, I would have 4 snort sensors and one of them be an ACID/PHP/MySQL log server. He does not want to pay for all the boxes because he thinks that they are going to cost $2.5k a pop. I think that we can go with a non major vendor (pogo linux, penguin computing, etc....) and get it cheaper, but that is a different story. So, he brought up the idea of having one big box and having multiple nics. Now, I know that this can easily be done using multiple snort processes/conf files/etc... However, I am wondering about the performance of such a beast. What type of horsepower do I need to monitor 2 T1s (on seperate networks) and 2 100MB networks (also seperate)? Also, it will probably be running the database as well, on a seperate network. Can people give me an idea of what they are running out there? Thanks! Jeremy Finke
Current thread:
- Design questions... Jeremy Finke (Oct 29)
- Re: Design questions... Jarret Gibson (Oct 29)
- RE: Design questions... Wayne T Work (Oct 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Design questions... Randy Bey (Oct 29)
- Re: RE: Design questions... larc (Oct 29)
- Design questions... Jeremy Finke (Oct 29)
- RE: RE: Design questions... Jeremy Finke (Oct 29)
- RE: Design questions... Jakub Molek (Oct 30)