Snort mailing list archives
Re: Replying conventions
From: Matt Kettler <mkettler () evi-inc com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:56:48 -0400
For the first question, many, many, many posters to the snort-users list asking for help are not subscribed to it. Hence the common convention of replying to both..
as for where the replies go, that's *supposed* to be up to the sender.. some lists munge the reply-to header and replace it with the list's address, but a lot of purists consider that pretty much a disfeature.
Admittedly many windows MUA's always set reply-to to the same value as from, but the header exists in email and is put in by the MUA for the express purpose of letting users control where the default replies go. I guess the windows-generation has decided that this is too confusing to allow mortal users to do. Sad.
At 05:10 PM 8/22/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> In any event, sounds like it's more or less a moot point and this > thread should die off. If someone has any good reason why such a reply > format would be of detriment to the list as a whole, and not just the > duplicated author, I encourage them to post it, but it sounds like > everyone else has no better ideas about this than I do. :) Honestly, I cant think of a good reason, the author and the list should be copied on the note separately. If you subscribe to the list, then obviously you will get any message sent to the list. Why get 2 copies? It also escapes me why clicking reply to a message on the list sends back to the original poster (by default) and not the snort list. Its very easy to forget to CC the list in this circumstances. 99% of the other lists I subscribe to are not this way. All that said, this list is by far the most responsive list I subscribe to. Anytime I have posted a question, I have gotten an answer, and in short time. Very impressive. Keep up the good work ;) -- Eric Joe Network Operations Journey's End Internet/Computer Connection Inc
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: Replying conventions, (continued)
- Re: Replying conventions twig les (Aug 21)
- Re: Replying conventions hackerwacker (Aug 21)
- Re: Replying conventions Chris Green (Aug 21)
- Re: Replying conventions Matt Kettler (Aug 21)
- Re: Replying conventions Jason (Aug 21)
- Re: Replying conventions Jon Quiros (Aug 21)
- Re: Replying conventions Matt Kettler (Aug 21)
- RE: Replying conventions Matt Yackley (Aug 22)
- Re: Replying conventions John Sage (Aug 22)
- Re: Replying conventions Matt Kettler (Aug 22)
- Re: Replying conventions John Sage (Aug 22)
- Re: Replying conventions Eric Joe (Aug 22)
- Re: Replying conventions Matt Kettler (Aug 22)
- Re: Replying conventions (hopefully the last one) Keith Young (Aug 22)
- Snort, php, MySQL and acid showing no activity Joshua Rogers (Aug 22)
- Re: Replying conventions Matt Kettler (Aug 22)