Secure Coding mailing list archives

Integrated Dynamic and Static Scanning

From: andrews at rbacomm.com (Brad Andrews)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:39:25 -0500


That is certainly true.  I was just commenting on the issue of systems  
that work together tightly.  None do now (as far as I know), but this  
should potentially allow that to happen.

I did here a few moans when this news came out, since IBM is not known  
for inexpensiveness from what I hear....  :)

-- 

Brad Andrews
RBA Communications
CSSLP, SANS/GIAC GSEC, GCFW, GCIH, GPCI


Quoting "McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)" <James.McGovern at thehartford.com>:

Sometimes integration is a good and bad thing.

Current thread:

IBM Acquires Ounce Labs, Inc., (continued)
- - - IBM Acquires Ounce Labs, Inc. Wall, Kevin (Aug 04)
    - IBM Acquires Ounce Labs, Inc. Arian J. Evans (Aug 04)
    - IBM Acquires Ounce Labs, Inc. Steven M. Christey (Aug 05)
    - IBM Acquires Ounce Labs, Inc. Romain Gaucher (Aug 05)
    - IBM Acquires Ounce Labs, Inc. Steven M. Christey (Aug 05)
    - IBM Acquires Ounce Labs, Inc. Matt Fisher (Aug 05)
    - IBM Acquires Ounce Labs, Inc. Arian J. Evans (Aug 05)
- IBM Acquires Ounce Labs, Inc. Matt Fisher (Jul 28)
  - Integrated Dynamic and Static Scanning Brad Andrews (Jul 28)
    - Integrated Dynamic and Static Scanning McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT) (Jul 29)
    - Integrated Dynamic and Static Scanning Brad Andrews (Jul 29)
    - Message not available
    - Integrated Dynamic and Static Scanning Brad Andrews (Jul 29)
    - Integrated Dynamic and Static Scanning Matt Fisher (Jul 29)