Secure Coding mailing list archives
Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25
From: yo at secappdev.org (Johan Peeters)
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:08:00 +0100
Steve I agree with you on this one. Both input validation and output encoding are countermeasures to the same basic problem -- that some of the parts of your string of data may get treated as control structures instead of just as data. For the purpose of this email I'm using a definition of "input
while I am being persuaded that you can use input validation and output encoding interchangeably as countermeasures for *some* problems documented here, there is another important dimension: enforcement of business rules. In this domain, I do not see an alternative to input validation. kr, Yo -- Johan Peeters http://johanpeeters.com
Current thread:
- Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25 Steven M. Christey (Jan 12)
- Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25 Greg Beeley (Jan 13)
- Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25 Johan Peeters (Jan 13)
- Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25 Florian Weimer (Jan 14)
- Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25 Johan Peeters (Jan 14)
- Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25 Johan Peeters (Jan 13)
- Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25 Steven M. Christey (Jan 14)
- Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25 Ivan Ristic (Jan 14)
- Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25 Jim Manico (Jan 14)
- Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25 Brian Chess (Jan 14)
- Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25 Ivan Ristic (Jan 15)
- Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25 Greg Beeley (Jan 13)
- Some Interesting Topics arising from the SANS/CWE Top 25 Joe Teff (Jan 15)