Secure Coding mailing list archives
Re: Secured Coding
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:27:33 +0000
I truly believe this as no matter how secured we make our programs there will always be someone to figure how to break it. So many people replied to this, I will too. It is not about if someone could or might hack - with enough resources, they would. Even if it is by physically breaking in and replacing your software with their own. Point is not if someone can potentially break your software. It is about making it as difficult as possible for them to do so until it might even become "not worth it". Gadi.
Current thread:
- Secured Coding Greenarrow 1 (Nov 13)
- Re: Secured Coding Gunnar Peterson (Nov 13)
- Re: Secured Coding Dana Epp (Nov 13)
- RE: Secured Coding David Crocker (Nov 14)
- Re: Secured Coding Gadi Evron (Nov 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fw: Secured Coding Greenarrow 1 (Nov 14)
- Re: Secured Coding Peter G. Neumann (Nov 15)
- RE: Secured Coding Yousef Syed (Nov 15)