Re: Vulnerability scanners don't work

[Erin Carroll <amoeba () amoebazone com>]

Based on list member feedback and direction from SecurityFocus, I have to 
second the moderator response from Teo Adams of the security-basics list 
on this issue. Quoting his post to security-basics:

"ATTENTION

Messages similar to the one originating this thread (ie I updated my blog 
come see, here's my website, etc.) will no longer be approved to this 
list. Perhaps it shouldn't have been approved in the first place but 
oversights occur from time to time.

Furthermore, positive/productive discussion related to this thread will be 
approved only for the sake of closure. However, since the thread is 
'heated' I suggest taking further discussion to private emails. The 
proposed poll is meaningless and has no bearing on the actions of the 
moderators of the list so any messages in response to the poll or that 
otherwise stray from the original topic will be rejected.

Thank you."

Because the discussion so far has been very relevant to pen-testing I'll 
allow on-topic and insightful posts on this thread to continue for closure 
but further posts that link to off-site discussion websites/blogs/etc will 
no longer be approved. I have no objection if members want to post the 
entire blog entry or some edited version of it to the list, but let's keep 
the discussion for the pen-test list *on* the pen-test list.

Thanks,


*note: I applaud Adriel Desautels work and contributions to the security 
community and the pen-test list and thank him for his always insightful 
and interesting discussion. This moderation policy change isn't singling 
anyone out but cross-postings, external blog links, etc increase the 
workload necessary to moderate. I get enough email as it is :-)

--
Erin Carroll
Moderator, SecurityFocus pen-test list