Re: EXAMPLE: Why OOO is *BAD* [WAS: Re: OOO FLAME]

[David Howe <DaveHowe.Pentest () googlemail com>]

R. DuFresne wrote:
> Still there are rules and processes that have been about for a long period
> of time.  society functions due to there being rules and procedures as
> well.  Rude is rude no matter the risk.  Internet lists have long had a
> policy that it is just plain rude to include them in company or even
> private out of office replies.  And ignoring repeated complaints from
> those that follow the rules and who are suffering from your ignorance
> demonstrates that you who continue to ignore such and subscribe and
> include in the silly out of office replies that you just do not belong
> involved in the internet community and the mailing lists that other
> professionals engage in.

I am more bothered by the flock we seem to have of googlemail groups and
so forth that have added their group to the list, not realising that the
"sender" of the messages will be the original author (not the list) so
they have no way to pre-authorize any given user to post to their list
without lifting posting restrictions entirely.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic

Top 5 Common Mistakes in 
Securing Web Applications
Get 45 Min Video and PPT Slides

www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar
------------------------------------------------------------------------