Penetration Testing mailing list archives

Re: Kaseya


From: "M.B.Jr." <marcio.barbado () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:37:08 -0300

Dear Ralph,


On 5/27/08, Utz, Ralph <rutz () realtime-it com> wrote:
Well, from what I understand it gather's it's data by ping scanning the
 network and referencing the results to it's database of PCs that it's
 agent is installed on.  If there is an IP that isn't in the database
 that comes up hot, it trys to access the IPC$ share I believe.  If it
 can access it, it flags it as a Windows box and trys to install it's
 agent on the device.  If not, it leaves it and moves on.


Your IP theory fails for dhcp LANs.

Kaseya's basic end-to-end connectionless protocol seems to go like this:
in the first moment at least, the MSP's Kaseya server acts as a
receiver for redundant, say, datagrams, that is, one-way-incoming
signals (from the MSP's perspective).
The Kaseya server feedback's not mandatory but once it's given, the
following would be formed of signals/requests with "Hello again, I'm
still here, wanna manage me and/or synchronize additional stuff?"
messages from its agents.
So far, our guessing is that the referred model would be less related
to network resiliency =)
Fourier would say this repetitive one-way-unicasting profusion (from
the customers' perspective) is a waste of energy, only.


Best regards,


 Weaknesses that stand out to me are 2 things.  One being that depending
 on how often you have the appliance set to scan and how old your network
 gear is, it could flood your network.  Two being that in order to access
 the IPC$ share on all the machines, you have to use a domain account
 that has rights to install software on the machine.  Most times this
 ends up with the MSP requiring a domain admin account because no one
 wants to fool with delegating permissions.

 So in theory, you have an appliance that floods your network with pings
 and possible clear txt attempts at using a domain admin account.


 -----Original Message-----
 From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com]
 On Behalf Of M.B.Jr.
 Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 2:01 PM
 To: pen-test list
 Subject: Kaseya


Hello list,
 there's this infrastructure tool set for automating managed services,
 named Kaseya (proprietary technology).

 Basically, the managed-services-provider controls one of his customers'
 remote LANs with two intercommunicating "appliances":

  * a Kaseya dedicated server located at the MSP data center; and

  * a "probe" equipment at the remote LAN.

 The audit team to which I belong is about to examine the probe-featured
 LAN.
 Right now, we're researching whether this "solution" can cause the LAN
 some weaknesses; the resulting research's report is going to shape the
 logical tests.

 So, the question is (I guess):
 does anyone know of any Kaseya-enhanced LAN security
 implication/vulnerability?

 Thank you,
 yours sincerely,


 --
 Marcio Barbado, Jr.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
 This list is sponsored by: Cenzic

 Top 5 Common Mistakes
 in Securing Web Applications
 Find out now! Get Webinar Recording and PPT Slides

 www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------




The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and may be privileged.

 If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message, delete any copies held

 on your systems and notify the sender immediately. You should not retain, copy, or use this

 email for any purpose, and any review or other use of this information by persons or

 entities other than the intended recipient or any retransmission without the written consent

 of the sender is expressly prohibited.





 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 This list is sponsored by: Cenzic

 Top 5 Common Mistakes
 in Securing Web Applications
 Find out now! Get Webinar Recording and PPT Slides

 www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------




-- 
Marcio Barbado, Jr.

"In fact, companies that innovate on top of open standards are
advantaged because resources are freed up for higher-value work and
because market opportunities expand as the standards proliferate."
Scott Handy
Vice President Worldwide Linux and Open Source, IBM

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic

Top 5 Common Mistakes 
in Securing Web Applications  
Find out now! Get Webinar Recording and PPT Slides

www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: