Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: [PEN-TEST] RAS PT
From: "Schwienteck, Matthew" <matthew.schwienteck () US PWCGLOBAL COM>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 06:22:25 -0500
You can tighten up many registry settings to ensure 1) You are legally protected 2) Your repair directory is protected, hence protecting SAM 3) Many other "hardening" practices can be incorporated 4) Ensure all unnecessary services are disabled 5) etc Cheers "Batten, Gerald" <GBatten () EXOCOM COM> on 10/04/2000 01:14:23 PM Please respond to Penetration Testers <PEN-TEST () SECURITYFOCUS COM> To: PEN-TEST () SECURITYFOCUS COM cc: Subject: [PEN-TEST] RAS PT I unfortunately have very little experience in doing any sort of PT on a RAS box... let's assume it's an NT box. Other than enforcing strong passwords or maybe strong authentication via certificates or SecurID-type cards, what else can I do to A) protect it, and B) run some sort of PT against it? Gerald. *Note: Views expressed in this e-mail are not necessarily those of my employer. **Note: Views expressed in this e-mail are not necessarily mine either. ---------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
Current thread:
- [PEN-TEST] RAS PT Batten, Gerald (Oct 04)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] RAS PT Nasir Farhat Khan (Oct 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [PEN-TEST] RAS PT Schwienteck, Matthew (Oct 05)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] RAS PT Thompson, Stephen (Oct 05)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] RAS PT Frank Knobbe (Oct 06)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] RAS PT H Carvey (Oct 06)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] RAS PT Batten, Gerald (Oct 09)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] RAS PT Peter Van Epp (Oct 10)