Re: Email Policy Changes

[Bugbear <gbugbear () gmail com>]

We have never been asked et al for any sort of forensic recovery of
data (as part of IP litigation)

We do however have an archiving solution however (that follows
retention policies)

On 1/18/11, Jack Daniel <jackadaniel () gmail com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Craig Freyman <craigfreyman () gmail com>
> wrote:
> > Jack - the ediscovery costs of a current litigation we're in are
> > astronomical. This is where this reactionary policy is coming from.
>
> Yep, like costs of a breach can lead to stupid security spend.  If
> only we scored the hourly rate of lawyers...
>
> Somewhat wandering off topic here, but-
>
> Has anyone dealt with forensic recovery being mandated in an
> e-discovery situation yet.  Court-ordered, or at least lawyer demanded
> under fear of court ordering it?
>
> If so, what does that mean for the way we store and delete email?
>
> Jack
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

-- 
Sent from my mobile device
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com