Google and China

[NSweaney at tulsacash.com (Nathan Sweaney)]

It makes you wonder if Google has strong evidence to suggest that the Chinese government was directly involved.  That 
would seem like reason enough to back out of the censorship deal.  We help you, then you hack us?  If the attackers 
were targeting Chinese users that would also seem to indicate the government.  It doesn't make sense that Chinese 
hackers would target only other Chinese users for any other reason.  

Nathan

-----Original Message-----
From: pauldotcom-bounces at mail.pauldotcom.com [mailto:pauldotcom-bounces at mail.pauldotcom.com] On Behalf Of Robin 
Wood
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 4:55 AM
To: PaulDotCom Security Weekly Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Pauldotcom] Google and China

The media, and maybe Google themselves, are lumping the censorship and
the hacking incident together as a reason to pull out but I don't see
how the two are related. Whether or not they are in China they can
still be targets of Chinese hackers. There is some evidence that the
current lot were going after the accounts of Chinese users but other
companies, such as Adobe, were also attacked so it wasn't all about
one Chinese group attacking another.

Am I missing something?

Robin

2010/1/14 Michael Miller <mike.mikemiller at gmail.com>:
> I have the same view. ?They will try to deflect any blame for any
> attack on western corporations. ?They might raise a stink for a little
> bit. It will be interesting to see what happens to google, if they
> close up shop or raid the google data center.
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:12 PM, iamnowonmai <iamnowonmai at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Like it or not they need us to buy their stuff. I don't see them doing a damn thing personally
> >
> > Michael Miller <mike.mikemiller at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > It will be interesting to see what China does. ?They could just take
> > > over Google.cn and seize the server farm as state property. ?It might
> > > make other companies think twice about doing business in China.
> > >
> > > -mmiller
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Karl Schuttler
> > > <karl.schuttler at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > In case you didn't see
> > > > it...?http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html
> > > >
> > > > "We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results
> > > > on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the
> > > > Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search
> > > > engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean
> > > > having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China."
> > > > Karl
> > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Robert Portvliet
> > > > <robert.portvliet at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I hope Google pulls out of China... but before they do make every
> > > > > search return
> > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989
> > > > > ?:)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Adrian Crenshaw <irongeek at irongeek.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Odd, to quote the email:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Technology Alert
> > > > > > from The Wall Street Journal
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Google said it is "reviewing the feasibility of our business operations
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > China" and may back out of China entirely, as it disclosed it had been
> > > > > > hit
> > > > > > with major cyberattacks it believes originated from the country.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In a blog post, Google said it detected a "highly sophisticated and
> > > > > > targeted
> > > > > > attack on our corporate infrastructure originating from China" in
> > > > > > mid-December and that the attack resulted in "the theft of intellectual
> > > > > > property from Google."
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126333757451026659.html?mod=djemalertTECH
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since the WSJ wants you to pay, see:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I hope they cover this on ISD tonight.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Adrian
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Pauldotcom mailing list
> > > > > > Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> > > > > > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> > > > > > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Robert Portvliet,
> > > > > GPEN, Security +
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Pauldotcom mailing list
> > > > > Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> > > > > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> > > > > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Pauldotcom mailing list
> > > > Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> > > > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> > > > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pauldotcom mailing list
> > > Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> > > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> > > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pauldotcom mailing list
> > Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com