Shell host

[xgermx at gmail.com (xgermx)]

So everyone seems to think that DIY is best. What if you're hosting shells
for not only yourself, but others as well?
Is hosting yourself still the best option?

2008/12/15 Chris Merkel <cmerkel at gmail.com>

> The best shell host is the one you build yourself.
>
> - Chris Merkel
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Karl Schuttler <karl.schuttler at gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > That one is my favorite too.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Mike Patterson <mike.patterson at unb.ca>
> > wrote:
> > > Edgar Safar wrote on 12/14/08 6:47 AM:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I just want to know what shell host is the best
> > >
> > > I like 127.0.0.1 myself, but your mileage may vary depending on your
> > > budget and work situation.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pauldotcom mailing list
> > > Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> > > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> > > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pauldotcom mailing list
> > Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pauldotcom.com/pipermail/pauldotcom/attachments/20081215/bc862876/attachment.htm