oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default?
From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen () simple dallas tx us>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 07:58:51 -0500 (CDT)
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Leonardo Taccari wrote:
Hello Bob, Bob Friesenhahn writes:The CERT advisory at https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/332928 provides a policy.xml example which does not appear to block PS2 and PS3, which are also entry points for reading Postscript. [...]If I am not missing something I think that ghostscript isn't used for them though.
You are missing something. While they are unlikely to be triggered by default (but still could be triggered by an attacker with sufficient control), testing shows that
convert -verbose PS2:file.ps outfile.png convert -verbose file.ps2 outfile.png convert -verbose PS3:file.ps outfile.png convert -verbose file.ps3 outfile.png does in fact invoke Ghostscript. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen () simple dallas tx us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
Current thread:
- Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default?, (continued)
- Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Aug 21)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Bob Friesenhahn (Aug 21)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Alex Gaynor (Aug 21)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Aug 21)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? AmitB (Aug 22)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Bob Friesenhahn (Aug 22)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Aug 22)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Leonardo Taccari (Aug 23)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Mateusz Lenik (Aug 23)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Leonardo Taccari (Aug 23)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Bob Friesenhahn (Aug 23)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Leonardo Taccari (Aug 23)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Bob Friesenhahn (Aug 23)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Aug 27)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Perry E. Metzger (Aug 27)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Marcus Meissner (Aug 28)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Aug 29)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Aug 29)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Marcus Meissner (Sep 03)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Sep 04)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Sep 04)
- Re: Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Bob Friesenhahn (Aug 21)
- Re: More Ghostscript Issues: Should we disable PS coders in policy.xml by default? Tavis Ormandy (Aug 21)