oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: USBCreator D-Bus service
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:22:33 -0700
On 04/22/2015 07:49 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 05:50:35PM -0700, Tavis Ormandy wrote:On Wednesday, April 22, 2015, Seth Arnold <seth.arnold () canonical com> wrote:We treat local root escalation vulnerabilities with a high priority[1].I wish you had spoken up during the previous discussion. It was my impression that embargoes for local privilege escalations were universally considered deprecated.I think Kurt's comment (in the linux-distros discussion) on not needing further vulnerability reports embargoed applied solely to ABRT. I can see how this can appear as extending to any local root issues, for users who have ABRT installed and enabled. Kurt might want to clarify this. Alexander
Clarification won't be possible for a bit, I'm actually meeting with Tavis tomorrow to discuss this and other things (this was scheduled some time ago, it seems I was right in assuming this would become a bigger issue =). -- Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service, (continued)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Tavis Ormandy (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Solar Designer (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Tavis Ormandy (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Tavis Ormandy (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Seth Arnold (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Tavis Ormandy (Apr 22)
- Re: Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Seth Arnold (Apr 22)
- Re: Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Marc Deslauriers (Apr 22)
- Re: Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Tavis Ormandy (Apr 22)
- Re: Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Kurt Seifried (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Solar Designer (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Kurt Seifried (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Grandma Eubanks (Apr 24)