oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: USBCreator D-Bus service
From: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold () canonical com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:14:08 -0700
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 05:50:35PM -0700, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
We treat local root escalation vulnerabilities with a high priority[1].I wish you had spoken up during the previous discussion. It was my impression that embargoes for local privilege escalations were universally considered deprecated.
Believe me, I would have spoken up had I noticed any concensus forming around that idea in the previous discussions; I don't recall seeing it. Anywhere, here we are, I'm speaking up now. Local root is still important to us.
Embargoes tend to make things worse, see your apport patch developed during embargo or shellshock for examples. However, if you're sure, I'm willing to do so for Ubuntu specific bugs in future.
I still believe reasonable length embargoes help more than they hurt; the failures are more obvious than the successes. Thanks
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Current thread:
- USBCreator D-Bus service Tavis Ormandy (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Solar Designer (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Tavis Ormandy (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Solar Designer (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Tavis Ormandy (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Tavis Ormandy (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Seth Arnold (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Tavis Ormandy (Apr 22)
- Re: Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Seth Arnold (Apr 22)
- Re: Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Marc Deslauriers (Apr 22)
- Re: Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Tavis Ormandy (Apr 22)
- Re: Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Kurt Seifried (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Solar Designer (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Kurt Seifried (Apr 22)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Grandma Eubanks (Apr 24)
- Re: USBCreator D-Bus service Solar Designer (Apr 22)