oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Healing the bash fork
From: "Kobrin, Eric" <ekobrin () akamai com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:39:03 -0500
On Sep 29, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Eric Blake <eblake () redhat com> wrote:
But I see no reason to move away from %% suffixing.
The suffix fixes the obvious CGI hole, but it leaves exposed programs in which the adversary gets to choose the variable name as well. env $'BASH_FUNC_foo%%=() { echo 123\n }' bash -c "foo" I think that a more robust solution, such using a separate store for functions, is needed if function import is to survive as a feature. -- Eric Kobrin
Current thread:
- Re: CVE-2014-6271: remote code execution through bash, (continued)
- Re: CVE-2014-6271: remote code execution through bash Chet Ramey (Sep 27)
- Re: CVE-2014-6271: remote code execution through bash Chet Ramey (Sep 27)
- Re: CVE-2014-6271: remote code execution through bash Eric Blake (Sep 27)
- Re: CVE-2014-6271: remote code execution through bash Eric Blake (Sep 27)
- Re: CVE-2014-6271: remote code execution through bash Eric Blake (Sep 27)
- Re: CVE-2014-6271: remote code execution through bash Chet Ramey (Sep 29)
- Re: CVE-2014-6271: remote code execution through bash Hanno Böck (Sep 27)
- Re: CVE-2014-6271: remote code execution through bash Eric Blake (Sep 28)
- Healing the bash fork (was: Re: [oss-security] CVE-2014-6271: remote code execution through bash) Florian Weimer (Sep 29)
- Re: Healing the bash fork Eric Blake (Sep 29)
- Re: Healing the bash fork Kobrin, Eric (Sep 29)
- Re: Healing the bash fork Tavis Ormandy (Sep 29)
- Re: Healing the bash fork David A. Wheeler (Sep 29)
- Re: Healing the bash fork John Haxby (Sep 29)
- Re: Healing the bash fork Kobrin, Eric (Sep 29)
- Re: Healing the bash fork Chet Ramey (Sep 29)
- Re: Healing the bash fork gremlin (Sep 29)
- Re: Healing the bash fork Florian Weimer (Sep 30)
- Re: Healing the bash fork Gennady Kupava (Sep 30)
- Re: Healing the bash fork gremlin (Sep 30)
- Re: Healing the bash fork Kobrin, Eric (Sep 29)