oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists
From: Matthieu Herrb <matthieu.herrb () laas fr>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 09:24:26 +0100
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:49:20AM +0300, Solar Designer wrote:
As to projects such as, say, Samba and X.org, I'd exclude them. There's no difficulty for a researcher to notify one of these directly, and there's not much difficulty in CC'ing the proper one of these on a discussion.
I think that as far as X.Org is concerned, we're ok with that. There are already security people from Linux distributions subscribed to the xorg-security@ list and they also have access to restricted 'security' bugs in bugzilla. -- Matthieu Herrb
Current thread:
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists, (continued)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Mark J Cox (Mar 04)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists David Hicks (Mar 04)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Nelson Elhage (Mar 04)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Steven M. Christey (Mar 04)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists S.P.Zeidler (Mar 05)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Greg KH (Mar 05)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists S.P.Zeidler (Mar 06)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Andrea Barisani (Mar 07)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Josh Bressers (Mar 08)
- Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists R P Herrold (Mar 08)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists akuster (Mar 08)