Re: Wild TTL value

[Gisle Vanem <gvanem () broadpark no>]

"David Fifield" <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:

> > Could you check if it changes the default TTL behavior on Linux?
>
> And incidentally, what was actual TTL sent on the network on Windows
> before and after this patch?

It seems to be using 64 mostly (initially?). 45 some other times
(from a quikc test with tcpdump on the side). Probably some Winsock 
sense behind this. But I have no docs on that.

On Linux, I have no clue what initial TTL it uses. I don't have
Linux here.

--gv
_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/