Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts
From: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:38:10 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/15/2012 01:05 PM, Patrik Karlsson wrote:
> So, in regards to the is_privileged checks, let's keep the checks in the > prerule until we find a general way to report errors back to the user without > cluttering the XML reports? There might be one or two more scripts that need > the change in that case. That's cool, if you also mean without cluttering the normal output, too. If this just means still using my rootfail solution, then that's fine, as long as every script on every host doesn't needlessly give me the same error message. I ment the normal output too, AFAIK script output ends up in both, right? The rootfail solution is fine with me, we only discussed to take it out of the prerule where it's redundant.
Sorry if I was confusing, I was in a hurry. I was just making a general statement because I don't know how the error reporting stuff will be done for NSE, and it may or may not be in just the regular script output (or at least this is what I've thought of when thinking about it). So yeah, if the error stuff just gets put in the regular script output then it should all the same.
Cheers, Patrik
Cheers, Kris Katterjohn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPEysfAAoJEEQxgFs5kUfu7o4QAIDzUaJKPfXnktd/z7BDK0zS hZGwdb22PCWPx4wR+qDRai4Jtw2uatDobd+mb4tRgknCTcXXUn0k6uJVMdOScLBw uZ/3rP1iPAhXwg0OBuRCQ2vJ31qqRl400IRpzcjvq/Qbid5y5fOGMvWGnpQ/MN+f CYUdQvGfzKu1uBPbCl1xMCE2GbWxaDbDdUDI/WgmN7F8CGp+VrU4PchP/mj/djJD ue48AhtRJJgPZYUNHy985sKQMl2ao+PcCx7oJf09Y2anjmPMuSaT+7ikKjo76Oh1 R7dSDzN9PQNi9uWKEj0hOrpVd9hGgXsZVqnrNDsVPAkYNdms5a/OzZJvpl7LiAeP vE7Xb1O92CqosKpv1rAhmASHzwodd2fT0FUL6pA2nDTMYlQD4w95U7+xBLzG56Uu bTHiu6c8C1GeR1gNbi9zFgVlkok5mnI+5r0TCSRE7O8AYIQdWeFI8P+POE0XGGqi 4MoCc1MxOcUiCOGm+6uelTKCW6Pdgf4u/tOOsRvUxCAOso9R5rsaggffREvyh3er uyvCXKZ3KDYTai8haCrtwguo/fWeqf5u0aPMBypzRxFkZzzqNBoamzVZmM+rvL8x qWOXYBHdzQs1QnEJurwcSsqTuPjCCKm9LIqv8PshHh7N0NUHMhWboYDMlnLfPtf1 SeJiJFAM+mbP4Ha9fegu =AtPx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts, (continued)
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts Henri Doreau (Jan 13)
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts Henri Doreau (Jan 13)
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts Patrik Karlsson (Jan 13)
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts Henri Doreau (Jan 13)
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts Patrik Karlsson (Jan 14)
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts Henri Doreau (Jan 14)
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts Kris Katterjohn (Jan 14)
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts Patrik Karlsson (Jan 15)
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts Kris Katterjohn (Jan 15)
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts Patrik Karlsson (Jan 15)
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts Kris Katterjohn (Jan 15)
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts Henri Doreau (Jan 13)
- Re: Privilege checks in broadcast-* scripts Henri Doreau (Jan 16)